Azure Penetration Testing: Top 5 Attack Vectors Every Security Team Should Know

June 28, 2025

Introduction

Microsoft Azure has become the cloud platform of choice for businesses across the UK and globally. With digital transformation accelerating, organisations are rapidly migrating infrastructure, data, and applications to Azure. However, this shift has also opened new doors for cyber attackers. Azure penetration testing is no longer optional. It is a necessity. This blog post is aimed at IT professionals, security consultants, and business leaders who want to understand the real risks and learn how to better protect their Azure environments.

Azure penetration testing involves simulating cyberattacks on Microsoft Azure environments to identify security weaknesses before malicious actors can exploit them. It is different from traditional pentesting because it requires knowledge of Azure-specific configurations, identity management, and cloud-native services. Imagine trying to break into a high-tech facility, but the doors, alarms, and keys are all digital and managed in the cloud.


If attackers know how to manipulate these systems, they can gain access with minimal noise. This is why Azure-specific pentesting matters now more than ever. With the increasing reliance on cloud services and tighter regulatory controls, knowing your vulnerabilities is crucial.

Common Threats or Challenges 

One of the most dangerous assumptions organisations make is thinking their Azure configurations are secure by default. In reality, misconfigurations, excessive permissions, and unmonitored accounts are common. For example, in 2023, a UK-based financial services company suffered a breach due to an exposed Azure Storage Account, leading to the leak of sensitive customer data. Attackers are increasingly targeting identity systems, serverless applications, and automation pipelines. Without continuous monitoring and testing, these weak points go unnoticed until it’s too late.

Azure AD Abuse

Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) is the central identity and access management service within Microsoft Azure. It is responsible for authenticating users, managing permissions, and enabling access to both cloud and on-premises resources. Because of its critical role, Azure AD is often targeted by attackers aiming to compromise cloud environments. Once an attacker gains access to Azure AD or exploits its misconfigurations, they can move laterally, escalate privileges, or exfiltrate data with minimal resistance. Understanding the key threats and how to mitigate them is essential for maintaining a secure Azure environment.


Common Attack Scenarios


Privilege escalation through misconfigured roles

One of the most common issues in Azure environments is the incorrect assignment of privileges. Administrators may inadvertently grant users more access than required for their role, violating the principle of least privilege. For example, assigning the “Contributor” role rather than a limited custom role can allow users to create new role assignments, ultimately giving themselves or others elevated permissions. In real-world penetration tests, attackers often exploit these misconfigurations to gain access to administrative functions or sensitive data.


Abuse of guest accounts with high-level access

Azure AD allows for the integration of guest users, which is beneficial for collaborating with partners or contractors. However, if these accounts are not properly restricted, they can pose a major security risk. Guest users should not have the same privileges as internal users, yet in many cases, they are granted excessive permissions either through group memberships or inherited roles. Attackers can exploit this oversight to gain unauthorised access, especially if the guest account credentials are compromised via phishing or credential stuffing.


Multi-factor authentication (MFA) bypass techniques

While MFA is a strong defence against credential-based attacks, it is not infallible. Sophisticated threat actors use techniques like session hijacking, man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, or token theft to bypass MFA controls. For example, an attacker might use tools like Evilginx to intercept tokens during the login process. Once obtained, these tokens can be replayed to impersonate legitimate users without needing to provide credentials or complete MFA challenges again.


Mitigation Tips


To protect against Azure AD abuse, organisations should take the following proactive measures:


  • Enforce the principle of least privilege (POLP): Review all role assignments and ensure users only have the permissions necessary for their tasks. Avoid using broad roles such as “Owner” or “Contributor” unless absolutely necessary.
  • Audit and monitor access regularly: Conduct periodic access reviews and utilise Azure AD’s built-in reporting to identify anomalies. Implement automated alerts for changes in role assignments or unusual login patterns.
  • Restrict guest access: Apply Conditional Access policies that limit what guest users can access and monitor their activities closely. Use entitlement management within Azure AD to control the lifecycle of external identities.
  • Strengthen MFA implementation: Use conditional access to enforce MFA only in high-risk scenarios, and consider using phishing-resistant MFA methods such as FIDO2 security keys. Monitor token usage and configure risk-based sign-in policies to detect suspicious authentication attempts.


By actively managing Azure AD and understanding its attack vectors, organisations can significantly reduce their exposure to identity-based threats. Securing Azure AD is not just a technical necessity; it’s a business imperative.


Mitigation Tips

Apply the Principle of Least Privilege (POLP) by ensuring users only have the access necessary for their roles. Regularly review roles and conduct access audits. Conditional Access Policies should be enforced to limit access based on user location, device status, or risk level.

Misconfigured Storage Accounts

Azure Storage Accounts are a core part of many cloud deployments, providing the ability to store unstructured data, including files, blobs, queues, and tables. However, their flexibility and ease of use can lead to serious security oversights. When storage accounts are misconfigured, they may inadvertently expose sensitive data to the public internet or allow unauthorised access through compromised credentials.


Real-World Exploits

One of the most common issues is the public exposure of blob containers. By default, Azure does not make containers publicly accessible, but misconfigurations during setup or continuous delivery processes can override these defaults. Attackers can use automated tools to scan for open containers and download data without authentication. This has occurred in numerous real-world incidents, including cases where internal documents, personally identifiable information (PII), and source code were publicly accessible.


Another serious problem is the leakage of storage account access keys. These keys act as master credentials, allowing full access to the storage account’s data. If access keys are accidentally committed to public code repositories, such as GitHub, attackers can immediately exploit them. This scenario is especially common in CI/CD pipelines where credentials are hardcoded or poorly managed. Once discovered, attackers can use these keys to extract, modify, or delete data at will.


Misconfigured storage is often low-hanging fruit for attackers. Even organisations with advanced cloud deployments may overlook these simple but critical vulnerabilities.


Mitigation Tips Disable anonymous access unless absolutely required. Use Shared Access Signatures (SAS) with scoped permissions and expiration. Regularly rotate access keys and scan repositories for credential leaks using tools like Microsoft Defender for DevOps.


Role Assignment and Privilege Escalation

In Azure, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is designed to manage who can access what resources and at what level. However, mismanagement of these roles often leads to excessive permissions being granted. When users or service principals are assigned broad roles such as “Contributor,” it can result in unintended privilege escalation paths, which attackers are quick to exploit.


Attack Path

A typical scenario involves an attacker gaining access to an account with “Contributor” rights. While this role doesn’t directly grant administrative privileges, it allows the user to assign roles to other accounts. This loophole enables the attacker to elevate privileges by assigning the “Global Administrator” role either to themselves or to a newly created malicious identity. Once in possession of this elevated access, the attacker has near-total control over the Azure environment, including identity systems, virtual machines, and data storage.


This kind of escalation often goes unnoticed due to weak auditing practices or the absence of real-time monitoring. In large organisations, where many roles and accounts exist, these dangerous pathways can remain hidden until they’re exploited.


Tools

  • AzureHound: A tool used to map out Azure AD and RBAC relationships, making privilege escalation paths visible.
  • PowerZure: A post-exploitation framework designed specifically for enumerating and exploiting Azure role misconfigurations.


Mismanaged role assignments are one of the most overlooked yet impactful security risks in Azure. Tightening these controls is critical for any organisation using Azure services.


Mitigation Tips

Create custom roles tailored to specific job functions. Monitor role changes using Azure Monitor. Implement Just-In-Time (JIT) access through Azure Privileged Identity Management (PIM) to reduce the window of exposure.


Logic App and Function App Abuses Azure’s serverless offerings like Logic Apps and Function Apps are powerful, but often misconfigured.


Exploits

  • Triggering Logic Apps externally via exposed HTTP endpoints
  • Accessing function code and environment variables via unsecured SCM endpoints


Mitigation Tips

Implement IP restrictions and authentication for all triggers. Validate inputs and sanitise data. Secure your deployment pipelines and avoid hardcoding secrets in code or config files.

The Cybergen Approach

Cybergen offers a proactive approach to cloud security. Our Azure Penetration Testing services are tailored to simulate real-world attacks while minimising operational impact. We use advanced tooling, manual testing, and proven methodologies to uncover hidden risks.


Our team also helps configure Azure Monitor, Conditional Access Policies, and Defender for Cloud to provide holistic protection. Cybergen empowers your team with actionable insights, training, and support, making sure you can defend your cloud environment confidently.

Summary

Azure penetration testing is essential in today’s cloud-first world. Attackers are evolving, and so must your security practices.


By focusing on Azure AD, token security, storage configurations, role management, and serverless protection, your organisation can significantly reduce its risk surface.


The threats are real, but so are the solutions. Start by assessing your environment today. Engage with our experts to get a clear picture of where you stand and how to strengthen your defences. The future of cybersecurity is proactive let’s move forward with confidence.

Ready to strengthen your security posture? Contact us today for more information on protecting your business.


Let's get protecting your business

Bibliography


Microsoft, 2024. Microsoft Azure Security Documentation. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/azure-security


NCSC, 2023. Secure cloud adoption. https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/cloud-security


OWASP, 2023. Serverless Top 10. Smith, A., 2023. Cloud Misconfigurations in the UK: A Case Study. Journal of Cyber Risk, 18(2), pp.102-115.


Cybergen Security, 2025. Azure Penetration Testing Services. [online] Available at: https://www.cybergensecurity.co.uk/penetration-testing

White car's front grill close-up, other car blurred in background, showroom setting, warm light.
September 18, 2025
Learn about smart grid cybersecurity risks and practical countermeasures. Cybergen explains threats, vulnerabilities, and steps to strengthen resilience today.
Close-up of a white car's front, with a blurred silver car in the background, inside a brightly lit showroom.
September 15, 2025
Learn how automotive companies are protecting connected vehicles against cyber threats. Explore risks, strategies, regulations, and expert advice from Cybergen.
September 15, 2025
When Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) was hit by a cyberattack, the ripple effects were immediate—not only shutting down its own production, but dragging much of its supply chain into uncertainty and putting thousands of jobs at risk. The story has raised important questions about how the UK protects key industries, supports workers, and builds resilience to digital threats. What Happened JLR had to halt production because its vital systems were compromised by the cyberattack. Sky News reports the shutdown has already lasted 12 days. The disruption isn’t confined to its own factories; many smaller suppliers (in JLR’s upstream and downstream networks) are also severely affected. Some suppliers have temporarily laid off around 6,000 staff . Workers at JLR itself (around 34,000 in the UK) remain off-work while the company restores systems. Key unions and the Business & Trade Committee (a group of MPs) are pushing for government intervention, calling for COVID-style financial support to help the supply chain and prevent loss of jobs. Why This Matters Supply Chain Fragility The incident underscores how tightly interwoven modern manufacturing is. Even when only one big firm is attacked, the effect cascades across dozens of smaller suppliers. Cashflow disruption in these smaller firms can lead to layoffs, insolvency, and loss of skills. Digital Risk Is Industrial Risk Cyberattacks aren’t just an IT problem. When companies rely on digital systems for production scheduling, hardware control, robotics, cross-site networks or cloud services, any breakdown can stop physical manufacturing altogether. Workers at the Brink Employees in smaller firms, often with fewer resources and less buffer capital, are particularly vulnerable. With no production and no income, many are under immediate financial stress. Policy & Government Role The calls from MPs for emergency schemes are reminiscent of measures used during COVID-19, meant to protect workers and businesses through unprecedented disruption. Such interventions are costly and complex, but may be essential to preserve industrial capacity in critical sectors. Reputation, Trust & Resilience Disruption of this kind damages not just immediate output, but also long-term trust with suppliers, investors, and customers. How fast a firm recovers—and how transparently it handles the attack—matters. What’s Being Proposed The Business & Trade Committee has asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves what kind of support is being offered to JLR’s suppliers to “mitigate the risk of significant long-term commercial damage.” Trade union Unite has suggested introducing a temporary furlough-style scheme specifically for workers in the supply chain. The idea is to preserve jobs while production is down. What Questions Remain How extensive is the damage to JLR’s systems, and how long will recovery take? The longer downtime goes on, the greater the economic risk. Which suppliers are most exposed, and how many might not survive prolonged cashflow disruption? What legal/regulatory obligations does JLR have to its suppliers versus its employees during such an attack? What kind of support package will the government realistically offer—will it be reactive, or will it structure something that gives industry confidence there’s a safety net? How will this event change how other companies plan for cyber resilience and business continuity? Lessons & Takeaways for Industry Prepare for Worst-Case Downtime : Firms need robust continuity plans. Not just backup of data, but plans for restoring production safely, fallback procurement options, etc. Ensure Adequate Cyber Defences : This includes not only perimeter protection but also rapid detection, segmentation (so problems in one system don’t immediately spread), and patching. Supply Chain Visibility : Know your suppliers well: their vulnerabilities, financial health, and contingency plans. If many small suppliers go under, the big OEMs feel the pain. Insurance & Risk Sharing : Evaluate whether cyber risk insurance can cover parts of the losses; maybe explore contractual risk sharing in the supply chain. Advocacy & Policy Engagement : Businesses need to work with government to design support mechanisms that can be deployed in these kinds of emergencies—both to protect industry and the workforce. What This Means Going Forward The JLR incident is likely to be a wake-up call. It shines a light on how modern industrial strength depends heavily on digital stability and resilient supply chains. For workers and smaller suppliers, the stakes are very high. The government’s response will test how well policy keeps up with the new kinds of risk in a tech-infused manufacturing age. For Jaguar Land Rover and its partners, this could bring into sharper focus investment in cyber resiliency, revisiting insurance, revising contracts with suppliers, and being proactive with contingency planning. Summary Jaguar Land Rover’s cyberattack is more than a headline; it’s a case study in how digital vulnerabilities can threaten real-world operations, jobs, and economic stability. As the UK grapples with how best to support its industrial base, it must weigh up not just the immediate financial aid, but the wider architecture of resilience: legal, technological, and economic.
Construction site with cranes silhouetted against a sunset.
September 10, 2025
Learn how construction firms safeguard sensitive project data against cyber theft. Practical steps, frameworks, and tools for cybersecurity in the UK construction sector.
Man wearing headphones in a blue-tinted studio, working at a computer with a microphone, lights, and monitors.
September 3, 2025
Learn about the top cyber threats facing streaming platforms in 2025. Cybergen experts explain risks such as credential theft, piracy, ransomware, and fraud, with practical security steps to protect your streaming business.
Website product page featuring a woman wearing a white shirt and dark pants; text on the left.
August 30, 2025
Learn why e-commerce sites must prioritise payment security. Explore threats, fraud prevention methods, secure payment processing, and how Cybergen protects online transactions.
Cityscape at night with the glowing 5G symbol overhead, connected by blue lines.
August 24, 2025
Explore the importance of 5G network security. Learn about 5G cybersecurity threats, risks, best practices, and how Cybergen strengthens cyber defence in 5G.
Modern apartment building with balconies under a bright blue sky.
August 23, 2025
Explore how cybersecurity protects the real estate industry. Learn about threats to real estate technology, practical solutions, and how Cybergen strengthens digital property security.
Skyscrapers of Canary Wharf, London, including Citibank, HSBC, and Barclays, tinted blue.
August 19, 2025
Explore how banks are fighting fraud with cybersecurity AI. Learn about risks, challenges, AI-driven solutions, and how Cybergen helps financial institutions stay secure.