Understanding Lateral Movement in a Corporate Network

July 10, 2025

Introduction

Cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving, and one of the most dangerous techniques used by attackers today is lateral movement. This method allows cybercriminals to explore a compromised network, accessing sensitive systems and data once initial entry is achieved. It is no longer sufficient to only guard the perimeter. The focus must now shift to identifying and stopping threats that are already inside.


This blog is for IT professionals, cybersecurity teams, business leaders, and students who want to understand lateral movement and the techniques attackers use to spread within networks. With recent attacks on global corporations making headlines, knowing how attackers move laterally is more critical than ever. This blog will break down the process and provide actionable strategies to stop it.

What Is Lateral Movement? 

Credential Harvesting: The First Step

Credential harvesting is usually the attacker’s first move after initial access. This involves collecting usernames and passwords, either in plain text or hashed format, from a compromised device.


Attackers use various methods to collect credentials. Common techniques include memory scraping, keylogging, and phishing. Tools such as Mimikatz, LaZagne, and Windows Credential Editor can extract stored passwords and hashes directly from system memory or the Windows Security Account Manager (SAM).


For example, an attacker gains access to an employee’s machine through a phishing email. They then use Mimikatz to dump credentials from memory. These credentials may include domain administrator usernames and passwords. This access can open the door to the entire network.

Once credentials are obtained, the attacker tests them across different systems. This trial-and-error approach is surprisingly effective due to password reuse and inconsistent password policies across organisations.

Pass-the-Hash Attacks

How Pass-the-Hash Works


Pass-the-hash is a technique where an attacker uses a stolen hashed password instead of cracking it. This works because many Windows systems accept hash values as valid credentials, especially in older versions or poorly configured systems.


Instead of needing the actual password, attackers use the hash to authenticate and move laterally. NTLM (NT LAN Manager) hashes are most commonly used in this attack. These are typically obtained through tools like Mimikatz.


Real Example

Using tools such as Impacket or CrackMapExec, an attacker can use a stolen NTLM hash to authenticate into another machine without needing to know the actual password. For instance, after dumping the NTLM hash from an initial machine, the attacker uses CrackMapExec to gain access to a file server.


Mitigation Techniques


To prevent pass-the-hash attacks, organisations should:


  • Disable NTLM authentication where possible
  • Enforce SMB signing to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks
  • Use Microsoft LAPS (Local Administrator Password Solution) to ensure local admin passwords are unique across systems
  • Limit the use of domain administrator accounts•
  • Monitor authentication logs for unusual activity


Pivoting Through the Network


What is Pivoting


Pivoting is the technique used by attackers to route their network traffic through a compromised system to reach other machines. It allows attackers to expand their reach within the network without needing direct access from the outside.


There are two common types of pivoting:


  • Proxy pivoting: Traffic is tunneled through the compromised host using tools like ProxyChains.
  • VPN pivoting: The attacker sets up a virtual network interface on the compromised host, essentially becoming part of the internal network.


Examples of Pivoting

An attacker may start by compromising a desktop computer using a phishing attack. From there, they use tools like Metasploit or Chisel to pivot into an internal HR database server. They may use SSH tunneling to obscure their movement and blend in with normal traffic.

Detection and Defence Strategies

Early detection of lateral movement is crucial for preventing a full-scale cyber attack. Once an attacker gains access to an internal network, the next objective is typically to move laterally between systems in search of valuable assets or data. Without robust detection mechanisms in place, attackers can remain undetected for days or even weeks. This section explores key strategies organisations can adopt to strengthen their defence posture and quickly identify suspicious activity within their networks.


Traditional signature-based detection methods are increasingly inadequate for spotting lateral movement. These systems rely on known attack patterns or malware signatures and are often blind to more subtle or customised attacks. Instead, behavioural detection has become the preferred approach. This technique monitors for anomalies in network or user activity. For example, if an employee account begins accessing systems it has never interacted with before, or if login attempts occur at unusual times, these are strong indicators of compromise. Behavioural analytics enables organisations to respond proactively before attackers escalate their activities.


Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems play a key role in threat detection. Platforms such as Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk aggregate and analyse log data from across the organisation. This includes login events, network traffic, file access records and system logs. By correlating these data points, SIEM platforms can identify patterns that suggest lateral movement or privilege escalation. Alerts can then be triggered in real-time, allowing security teams to act swiftly.


Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools are also essential in a modern cybersecurity strategy. Solutions such as WatchGuard EDR continuously monitor endpoint activity, including processes, registry changes and file behaviour. These tools offer visibility at the host level and can detect suspicious activity even if the attacker uses legitimate credentials or "living off the land" techniques. EDR platforms often provide automated responses, such as isolating infected systems or terminating malicious processes, thereby reducing the impact of an attack.


In addition to technical solutions, organisations should regularly conduct red team and blue team exercises. Red teams simulate the tactics of real-world attackers, attempting to breach defences and move laterally within the network. Blue teams are responsible for defending the network and detecting the attack. These simulations uncover gaps in the organisation’s security posture and test the effectiveness of current monitoring and response tools. Lessons learned from such exercises should be fed back into security policies and playbooks to continuously improve resilience.


Furthermore, adopting a zero-trust architecture significantly limits the scope of lateral movement. This approach assumes that no part of the network is automatically trusted, even if it lies behind the firewall. Every user and device must be authenticated and authorised before gaining access to resources. Combined with network segmentation and role-based access controls, zero-trust reduces the risk of attackers freely moving from one system to another.



In conclusion, detecting lateral movement requires a proactive and layered defence strategy. Behavioural analytics, SIEM and EDR platforms, combined with simulated exercises and a zero-trust mindset, equip organisations to stay one step ahead of attackers. Cybergen strongly recommends a holistic approach that incorporates both cutting-edge tools and a culture of continuous vigilance.

The Cybergen Approach

At Cybergen, we understand the evolving threat landscape. Our services help organisations strengthen their defences against lateral movement and other internal threats.


We offer advanced threat detection solutions, including SIEM integration, EDR configuration, and custom alerting rules tailored to your network. Our consultancy services help businesses develop and implement zero-trust security models, where every access request is verified and monitored.


We also provide phishing simulation campaigns, credential hygiene audits, and internal penetration testing to prepare your team for real-world attacks.


Learn more about how we can help at www.cybergensecurity.co.uk.

Summary

Lateral movement represents one of the most dangerous phases of a cyber attack. Once attackers bypass the perimeter, they look for ways to spread within your network, often going undetected for weeks.


Understanding how credential harvesting, pass-the-hash attacks, and pivoting work can help your organisation develop a more robust defence strategy. Cybergen is here to support your efforts, offering the tools and knowledge needed to detect, respond to, and prevent lateral movement in your environment.


Stay proactive. Take action. Secure your network from the inside out.

Ready to strengthen your security posture? Contact us today for more information on protecting your business.


Let's get protecting your business

Industrial factory interior with machinery, assembly lines, and carts.
October 12, 2025
Learn why ransomware is a rising threat to manufacturing plants. Explore real-world examples, data-driven insights, and expert guidance to strengthen your cybersecurity defences and protect production operations.
Cargo plane being loaded with crates by a worker on the tarmac at sunset.
October 7, 2025
Learn how cybersecurity supports airport infrastructure management, protects passenger data, and secures aviation systems from digital threats. Discover best practices, frameworks, and Cybergen Security solutions for stronger airport resilience.
Big Ben clock tower bathed in warm sunlight, part of the Houses of Parliament, London.
October 4, 2025
Learn how government systems face the growing threat of cyber warfare, what attacks target national infrastructure, and how Cybergen helps build resilience through advanced cybersecurity.
Man and woman in business attire reviewing documents at a table; light streams through a window.
October 4, 2025
Learn how law firms can strengthen cybersecurity to protect sensitive client data, prevent breaches, and meet UK compliance standards with Cybergen’s expert guidance.
Black man in a white coat in a pharmacy, looking down at shelves of medicines.
October 2, 2025
Protect pharmaceutical research from cyber espionage. Learn about current threats, risks, real-world breaches, and practical security steps. Expert advice from Cybergen Security.
Miniature electrical power grid illustration with glowing green lines and buildings.
September 29, 2025
Learn how to protect hotel management systems and guest data from rising cyber threats. Explore practical strategies, compliance steps, and expert advice from Cybergen Security.
White car's front grill close-up, other car blurred in background, showroom setting, warm light.
September 18, 2025
Learn about smart grid cybersecurity risks and practical countermeasures. Cybergen explains threats, vulnerabilities, and steps to strengthen resilience today.
Close-up of a white car's front, with a blurred silver car in the background, inside a brightly lit showroom.
September 15, 2025
Learn how automotive companies are protecting connected vehicles against cyber threats. Explore risks, strategies, regulations, and expert advice from Cybergen.
September 15, 2025
When Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) was hit by a cyberattack, the ripple effects were immediate—not only shutting down its own production, but dragging much of its supply chain into uncertainty and putting thousands of jobs at risk. The story has raised important questions about how the UK protects key industries, supports workers, and builds resilience to digital threats. What Happened JLR had to halt production because its vital systems were compromised by the cyberattack. Sky News reports the shutdown has already lasted 12 days. The disruption isn’t confined to its own factories; many smaller suppliers (in JLR’s upstream and downstream networks) are also severely affected. Some suppliers have temporarily laid off around 6,000 staff . Workers at JLR itself (around 34,000 in the UK) remain off-work while the company restores systems. Key unions and the Business & Trade Committee (a group of MPs) are pushing for government intervention, calling for COVID-style financial support to help the supply chain and prevent loss of jobs. Why This Matters Supply Chain Fragility The incident underscores how tightly interwoven modern manufacturing is. Even when only one big firm is attacked, the effect cascades across dozens of smaller suppliers. Cashflow disruption in these smaller firms can lead to layoffs, insolvency, and loss of skills. Digital Risk Is Industrial Risk Cyberattacks aren’t just an IT problem. When companies rely on digital systems for production scheduling, hardware control, robotics, cross-site networks or cloud services, any breakdown can stop physical manufacturing altogether. Workers at the Brink Employees in smaller firms, often with fewer resources and less buffer capital, are particularly vulnerable. With no production and no income, many are under immediate financial stress. Policy & Government Role The calls from MPs for emergency schemes are reminiscent of measures used during COVID-19, meant to protect workers and businesses through unprecedented disruption. Such interventions are costly and complex, but may be essential to preserve industrial capacity in critical sectors. Reputation, Trust & Resilience Disruption of this kind damages not just immediate output, but also long-term trust with suppliers, investors, and customers. How fast a firm recovers—and how transparently it handles the attack—matters. What’s Being Proposed The Business & Trade Committee has asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves what kind of support is being offered to JLR’s suppliers to “mitigate the risk of significant long-term commercial damage.” Trade union Unite has suggested introducing a temporary furlough-style scheme specifically for workers in the supply chain. The idea is to preserve jobs while production is down. What Questions Remain How extensive is the damage to JLR’s systems, and how long will recovery take? The longer downtime goes on, the greater the economic risk. Which suppliers are most exposed, and how many might not survive prolonged cashflow disruption? What legal/regulatory obligations does JLR have to its suppliers versus its employees during such an attack? What kind of support package will the government realistically offer—will it be reactive, or will it structure something that gives industry confidence there’s a safety net? How will this event change how other companies plan for cyber resilience and business continuity? Lessons & Takeaways for Industry Prepare for Worst-Case Downtime : Firms need robust continuity plans. Not just backup of data, but plans for restoring production safely, fallback procurement options, etc. Ensure Adequate Cyber Defences : This includes not only perimeter protection but also rapid detection, segmentation (so problems in one system don’t immediately spread), and patching. Supply Chain Visibility : Know your suppliers well: their vulnerabilities, financial health, and contingency plans. If many small suppliers go under, the big OEMs feel the pain. Insurance & Risk Sharing : Evaluate whether cyber risk insurance can cover parts of the losses; maybe explore contractual risk sharing in the supply chain. Advocacy & Policy Engagement : Businesses need to work with government to design support mechanisms that can be deployed in these kinds of emergencies—both to protect industry and the workforce. What This Means Going Forward The JLR incident is likely to be a wake-up call. It shines a light on how modern industrial strength depends heavily on digital stability and resilient supply chains. For workers and smaller suppliers, the stakes are very high. The government’s response will test how well policy keeps up with the new kinds of risk in a tech-infused manufacturing age. For Jaguar Land Rover and its partners, this could bring into sharper focus investment in cyber resiliency, revisiting insurance, revising contracts with suppliers, and being proactive with contingency planning. Summary Jaguar Land Rover’s cyberattack is more than a headline; it’s a case study in how digital vulnerabilities can threaten real-world operations, jobs, and economic stability. As the UK grapples with how best to support its industrial base, it must weigh up not just the immediate financial aid, but the wider architecture of resilience: legal, technological, and economic.